Sign in or 

Table of Contents 1 Aftoasiatic CARLETON T. HODGE 2 Egypt and Nubia: Old, Middle, and New Kingdom Eras 3 Egypt and the Kushites: Dynasty XXV EDNA R. RUSSMANN 4 The Kingdom of Meroe STANLEY M. BURSTEIN 5 The Ballaia Kingdom and Culture: Twilight of Classical Nubia WILLIAM Y. ADAMS 6 The Berbers of the Maghreb and Ancient Carthage REUBEN G. BULLARD 7 An Archaeological Survey of the Cyrenaican and Marmarican Regions of Northeast Africa DONALD WHITE 8 Attitudes towards Blacks in the Greek and Roman World: Misinterpretations of the Evidence FRANK M. SNOWDEN, JR. 9 Some Remarks on the Processes of State Formation in Egypt and Ethiopia KATHRYN A. BARD AND RODOLFO FATTOVICH 10 Colonizing the Past: Origin Myths of the Great Zimbabwe Ruins MAYNARD W. SWANSON List of Contributors |
| Schrader, Alvin. "INTERNET CENSORSHIP: Issues for teacher-librarians." Teacher Librarian 26.5 (May 1999): 8. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. [The American University of Rome Library], [Rome, Italy]. 16 Mar. 2008 <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=1934831&site=ehost-live>. |
| Foster, S. K., Paulk, A., & Dastoor, B. R. (1999). Can we really teach test-taking skills? New Horizons in Adult Education, 13 (1). Retrieved February 7, 2000, from http://www.nova.edu/~aed/newhorizons.html |
Let us turn to the critique of the specific lists under consideration by the Department. It is in their nature to be conservative, and this naturally implies certain biases. The five lists are strongly inclined to favour English as the language of academic discourse and publication. This recognises what is clearly an objective reality in the world of scholarly communication. The Minister of Education, indeed, has stated that he 'acknowledges the current position of English and Afrikaans as the dominant languages of instruction in higher education and believes that in the light of practical and other considerations it will be necessary to work within the confines of the status quo until such time as other South African languages have been developed to a level where they may be used in all higher education functions' (Department of Education 2002: 10). While we reluctantly accept this as realistic policy, we suggest that the Department may be missing an opportunity for the active promotion of multilingualism. This is a declared policy objective, yet there is no reference to possible support for publication in South African languages anywhere in the Policy and procedures for measurement of research document. Similarly, the overseas lists and citation indexes are understandably biased in favour of the so-called 'international‘ journals (i.e. predominantly those published in the United States or the United Kingdom).2We shall return to this point below, but we want to emphasise that we are most emphatically not advocating a crude 'local is lekker' philosophy at all costs. Of course South African researchers must publish internationally; and of course the communities of referees doing peer review must remain as diverse as possible. But the lists as they are made up at present are skewed. A subtle but important point is that journals that are marginally included and excluded in citation lists as the result of ranking by citation impact are vulnerable to 'noise and random effects' that may lead to considerable fluctuations in their rankings over quite short time periods (Rousseau 2002: 428). Thus the inclusion or exclusion of low impact journals from citation lists does not necessarily reflect significant differences in quality. The lists also tend to favour recognition of print or print-plus-electronic publication as a medium, rather than embracing new means of scholarly communication such as purely electronic journals or scholarly open archives. Adherence to the use of these simple indexes may be predicated on a (perhaps rapidly) disappearing model of scholarly communication. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. The importance of this insight becomes even clearer when we consider that in 1995, ISI was indexing about 3,300 scientific journals from the 70,000 or so published worldwide - or about 4.7 percent of the literature (Gibbs, 1995:76). This level of participation, as Christopher T. Zielinski of the World Health Organization has commented, 'is simply too little to account for the scientific output of eighty percent of the world' (cited by Gibbs, 1995:79). 2. Rousseau argues, citing Garfield, that there is no 'scientifically valid definition of bias' but does not seem to argue against the truth of the charge (2002: 429). |
References Bradford, S. C. 1948. Documentation. London: Crosby Lockwood. Brittz, J. J. & Lor, P. 2003. A moral reflection on the information flow from South to North: an African perspective Libri 53f3V 160-173. Dept.. of Education. 2002. Language policy for higher education. November. [PDF file] Available: http://www.ched.uct.ac.za/offee/ldg/doelanguagepolicy.pdf [site visited 7 March 2004]. Dept. of Education. 2003. Policy and procedures for measurement of research output of public higher education institutions. [PDF file] Available: http://education.pwv.gov.za/content/documents/307.pdf [site visited 7 March 2004]. Garfield, E. 1979. How do we select journals for Current Contents! Current Contents 45 (5 November):5-8. Garfield, E. 1990. How ISI selects journals for coverage: quantitative and qualitative considerations. Current Contents 22 (28 May): 185-193. Garfield, E. 1993. Despite problems with peer review, science publishing is healthier than ever. The Scientist, 7(18): 12. [Web page] Available: http://www.the-scientist.com/yr1993/sep/comm_9309Z0.html [site visited 11 August 2003]. Gibbs, W. W. 1995. Lost science in the Third World. Scientific American. 273(2):76-83. Jacobs, D. 2001. A bibliometric study of the publication patterns of scientists in South Africa 1992-96, with particular reference to status and funding. Information Research 6 (3). Available: http://informationr.net/ir/6-3/paperl04.html [site visited 11 August 2003]. Milloy, S. 2002. Freaky frog fraud. PestFacts.org. [Web page] Available: http://www.pestfacts.org/freakyjrog.html [site visited 11 November 2002]. Moya-Anegon, F. & Herrero-Solana, V. 2002. Visibilidad internacional de la produccion cientffica iberoamericana en biblioteconomia y documentacion, 1991 -2000. Ciencia da Informagao [Brasilia], 31 (3): 54-65. Romanos de Tiratel, S. and others. 2003. Las revistas argentinas de filologfa, literatura y linguistica: visibilidad en bases de datos internacionales. Ciencia da Informagao [Brasilia], 32 (3): 128-139. Rousseau, R. 2002. Journal evaluation: technical and practical issues. Library Trends 50(3): 418-439. Scheven, Y. 1977. Africana in the indexes. History in Africa 4: 207-227. Sturrock, J. 1998. Le pauvre Sokal. London Review of Books 20 (14) (I6july). Available: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v20/nl4/sturOI _.html [site visited 11 August 2003]. Theoretical physics: publish and perish. 2002. Economist. 365 (16 November):82. Warner, J. 2000. A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises |
j.weinheimer |
Latest page update: made by j.weinheimer
, Jun 3 2009, 5:23 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by j.weinheimer
12 words added 2 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|